Add the whole blog
This commit is contained in:
parent
0d2f58ce7a
commit
c4f23c1529
418 changed files with 15708 additions and 0 deletions
14
content/post/2006-01-08-programming-quality.markdown
Normal file
14
content/post/2006-01-08-programming-quality.markdown
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
author: einar
|
||||
categories:
|
||||
- Linux
|
||||
comments: true
|
||||
date: "2006-01-08T14:32:03Z"
|
||||
slug: programming-quality
|
||||
title: Programming quality
|
||||
disable_share: true
|
||||
wordpress_id: 20
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Yesterday I tried to run an electronic Italian-English dictionary I own. As I write my novel using [LaTeX](http://www.latex-project.org) and I have an environment on Linux, I thought it would good to use [WINE](http://www.winehq.com) to read it. I was wrong. Wine has progressed immensely and the commercial offerings (for example CodeWeavers) are even capable of running Office in its latest incarnation: however they are totally useless in front of the extremely bad quality of those dictionaries (from a programming point of view). They only work in Windows because the underlying (crappy) environment can compensate for an equally crappy program.
|
||||
For now I'll use an online dictionary I found. At least that only requires a browser.
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue