Add the whole blog
This commit is contained in:
		
					parent
					
						
							
								0d2f58ce7a
							
						
					
				
			
			
				commit
				
					
						c4f23c1529
					
				
			
		
					 418 changed files with 15708 additions and 0 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -0,0 +1,18 @@ | |||
| --- | ||||
| author: einar | ||||
| categories: | ||||
| - General | ||||
| - Linux | ||||
| comments: true | ||||
| date: "2006-06-03T20:04:38Z" | ||||
| slug: the-problem-with-binary-only-drivers | ||||
| title: The problem with binary only drivers | ||||
| disable_share: true | ||||
| wordpress_id: 73 | ||||
| --- | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Today I've been trying to set up suspend to RAM and suspend to disk (also known as hibernate) on my laptop using Kubuntu 6.06 LTS. Both tries failed miserably, sadly. The machine would suspend and also wake up, but I'd get only a garbled screen. This means that the video driver failed to wake up properly: this is the well known fglrx driver, the binary only driver that ATI made for Linux. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Even without mentioning the extremely sloppy quality of ATI's drivers in general (both Windows and Linux), this shows a fundamental problem with binary drivers, as many have said. Without the source, I can't fix/ask for help. I need to rely on the vendor input, which is quite scarce in this case. And if they decide to drop support, I'll be screwed. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| I'm not thinking that everything should be open source, but having a parallel, open implementation of video drivers with **clear**, documented specs would be extremely helpful... not to mention that competition would also help. | ||||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		Add a link
		
	
		Reference in a new issue