Add the whole blog

2020-12-28 18:06:15 +01:00 · 2020-12-28 18:06:15 +01:00 · c4f23c1529
commit c4f23c1529
parent 0d2f58ce7a
418 changed files with 15708 additions and 0 deletions
--- a/content/post/2007-07-21-why-kde.markdown
+++ b/content/post/2007-07-21-why-kde.markdown
@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+---
+author: einar
+categories:
+- Linux
+comments: true
+date: "2007-07-21T10:08:35Z"
+slug: why-kde
+title: Why KDE?
+disable_share: true
+wordpress_id: 274
+---
+
+The title comes from some random thoughts I had while reading [aseigo's latest entry on Plasma](http://http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2007/07/plasma-update.html). I was thinking about the line "who uses KDE for his/her day job, and why?", but related perhaps to people who don't code for a living. Here I will illustrate my point of view on why I chose KDE as my day to day desktop environment.
+
+<!--more--> It's not like I started on KDE at all: back in 1995, when I first tried Linux out, I used fwvm, and didn't quite get used to its way of doing things. When I returned to the penguin OS a few years later, I installed a copy of Red Hat (I think it was RH 6, but I'm not sure). It came with GNOME and Enlightement as the window manager. For a long time I used that desktop environment, but:
+
+
+
+	
+  * It felt somewhat ''alien'' to me;
+
+	
+  * Admittedly it was still in its infancy, so not quite sophisticated
+
+
+Later I got to try a copy of SUSE 6.4, which came with either KDE or GNOME. I tried KDE (back in its 1.x days) and I thought "how ugly!", so I returned to GNOME. This went on for a while, until I got Mandrake (now Mandriva) 7.2.
+
+Mandrake offered packages for the then new KDE 2. I admit that I was blown away by the change, everything was much _better_ than what it used to be! Still, it had a lot of quirks, but I soon started getting familarised with the platform. What I liked best was the integration of features, still in its infancy but on the way to become something interesting.
+
+KDE 3 then came, and while it looked "less revolutionary", it brought integration at a whole new level. I still used GNOME from time to time, but the feature removal was not what I wanted (even though I'm not as much of a power user as I used to be), so I decided to see what KDE would bring.
+
+I first started using KDE for fun, but now I use it in my bioinformatics work every day. There are a number of applications I use constantly, such as KDevelop (it may be worse than eric for Python support but I find it a really nice IDE),  Konqueror and its io-slaves (do I have to mention fish://?) , Kontact (I find its integration and features better than what Thunderbird has to offer), Amarok (for music in the boring moments) and Kate (a rather nice editor).
+
+Also, other applications that are not part of KDE that I use constantly, and which fit into the DE perfectly are Kile, Yakuake and k3b.
+
+The way everything is arranged, integrated and designed helps me in being quite productive, and even if there are quirks, they aren't as annoying as some Windows bugs.  I like the idea of a consistent DE, from file operations to looks to the way applications behave. When I get back to Windows, with its mess of non-standard widgets and UI operations, I cringe.
+
+So, I would like to congratulate the whole KDE developer community for making an amazing piece of software and also for making my work easier. I am really interested in seeing how KDE 4 will shape out.