Add the whole blog
This commit is contained in:
parent
0d2f58ce7a
commit
c4f23c1529
418 changed files with 15708 additions and 0 deletions
23
content/post/2007-09-01-science-and-microsoft-word.markdown
Normal file
23
content/post/2007-09-01-science-and-microsoft-word.markdown
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
author: einar
|
||||
categories:
|
||||
- Linux
|
||||
- Science
|
||||
comments: true
|
||||
date: "2007-09-01T12:45:57Z"
|
||||
header:
|
||||
image_fullwidth: banner_other.jpg
|
||||
slug: science-and-microsoft-word
|
||||
title: Science and Microsoft Word
|
||||
disable_share: true
|
||||
wordpress_id: 283
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
At the time of writing, a lot of people (even in bioinformatics) uses Microsoft Word to write their papers. I personally think it's not a good idea, and not just for the file formats (like Microsoft lobbying semi-legally to get OOXML approved by ISO), but because for scientific papers the WYSIWYG paradigm is not appropriate.
|
||||
|
||||
<!--more-->Scientific papers describe content, and a scientist should not be concerned with formatting, spacing, and similar things. The same applies to handling references (I still see a lot of people who label them **manually!**). Not to mention the problems with using a binary format which changes between releases and is not interoperable with non-Windows OSes (90% of our bioinformatics people, me included, uses Linux).
|
||||
|
||||
The solution? Using a document preparation system which handles all the formatting and the author needs only to focus on content. Personally I'm rather fond of [LaTeX](http://www.latex-project.org) despite its seemingly odd syntax. Some critics may say that "it's like a programming language" but that's no excuse: programs like [LyX](http://www.lyx.org) (which wrap LaTeX around a GUI) make LaTeX much more user friendly and are useful also to less computer-savy people. LaTeX also handles references to tables and figures, numbers them automatically and handles the bibliography using text-based bibliography files (and unlike Endnote, it's free). The output is a high-quality PDF that can also be supplied to most journals without hassle. I'm using LaTeX to write [my fiction books](http://www.stealsaga.net) and also for my Ph.D. thesis.
|
||||
|
||||
So why keep using Microsoft Word? People who do science should not be scared of trying something new, especially if it will increase their productivity.
|
||||
*[WYSIWYG]: What You See Is What You Get
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue