Add the whole blog
This commit is contained in:
		
					parent
					
						
							
								0d2f58ce7a
							
						
					
				
			
			
				commit
				
					
						c4f23c1529
					
				
			
		
					 418 changed files with 15708 additions and 0 deletions
				
			
		
							
								
								
									
										23
									
								
								content/post/2007-09-01-science-and-microsoft-word.markdown
									
										
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										23
									
								
								content/post/2007-09-01-science-and-microsoft-word.markdown
									
										
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							|  | @ -0,0 +1,23 @@ | |||
| --- | ||||
| author: einar | ||||
| categories: | ||||
| - Linux | ||||
| - Science | ||||
| comments: true | ||||
| date: "2007-09-01T12:45:57Z" | ||||
| header: | ||||
|   image_fullwidth: banner_other.jpg | ||||
| slug: science-and-microsoft-word | ||||
| title: Science and Microsoft Word | ||||
| disable_share: true | ||||
| wordpress_id: 283 | ||||
| --- | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| At the time of writing, a lot of people (even in bioinformatics) uses Microsoft Word to write their papers. I personally think it's not a good idea, and not just for the file formats (like Microsoft lobbying semi-legally to get OOXML approved by ISO), but because for scientific papers the WYSIWYG paradigm is not appropriate. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| <!--more-->Scientific papers describe content, and a scientist should not be concerned with formatting, spacing, and similar things. The same applies to handling references (I still see a lot of people who label them **manually!**). Not to mention the problems with using a binary format which changes between releases and is not interoperable with non-Windows OSes (90% of our bioinformatics people, me included, uses Linux). | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| The solution? Using a document preparation system which handles all the formatting and the author needs only to focus on content. Personally I'm rather fond of [LaTeX](http://www.latex-project.org) despite its seemingly odd syntax. Some critics may say that "it's like a programming language" but that's  no excuse: programs like [LyX](http://www.lyx.org) (which wrap LaTeX around a GUI) make LaTeX much more user friendly and are useful also to less computer-savy people. LaTeX also handles references to tables and figures, numbers them automatically and handles the bibliography using text-based bibliography files (and unlike Endnote, it's free). The output is a high-quality PDF that can also be supplied to most journals without hassle. I'm using LaTeX to write [my fiction books](http://www.stealsaga.net) and also for my Ph.D. thesis. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| So why keep using Microsoft Word? People who do science should not be scared of trying something new, especially if  it will increase their productivity. | ||||
|   *[WYSIWYG]: What You See Is What You Get | ||||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		Add a link
		
	
		Reference in a new issue