dennogumi/content/post/2006-06-03-the-problem-with-binary-only-drivers.markdown
Luca Beltrame 64b24842b8
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing
Update all posts to not show the header text
2021-01-13 00:05:30 +01:00

19 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown

---
author: einar
categories:
- General
- Linux
comments: true
date: "2006-06-03T20:04:38Z"
slug: the-problem-with-binary-only-drivers
title: The problem with binary only drivers
omit_header_text: true
disable_share: true
wordpress_id: 73
---
Today I've been trying to set up suspend to RAM and suspend to disk (also known as hibernate) on my laptop using Kubuntu 6.06 LTS. Both tries failed miserably, sadly. The machine would suspend and also wake up, but I'd get only a garbled screen. This means that the video driver failed to wake up properly: this is the well known fglrx driver, the binary only driver that ATI made for Linux.
Even without mentioning the extremely sloppy quality of ATI's drivers in general (both Windows and Linux), this shows a fundamental problem with binary drivers, as many have said. Without the source, I can't fix/ask for help. I need to rely on the vendor input, which is quite scarce in this case. And if they decide to drop support, I'll be screwed.
I'm not thinking that everything should be open source, but having a parallel, open implementation of video drivers with **clear**, documented specs would be extremely helpful... not to mention that competition would also help.