1.5 KiB
author | categories | comments | date | header | slug | tags | title | omit_header_text | disable_share | wordpress_id | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
einar |
|
true | 2008-02-14T20:17:09Z |
|
meta-analysis-difficulty-increasing |
|
Meta analysis difficulty increasing | true | true | 377 |
Again in the past days I've been banging my head thanks to the fact that doing meta-analysis with microarray data is more difficult than what it seems.
The problem sometimes lies in the data, sometimes lies in the analysis software and sometimes in a combination of factors. When doing work on a public data set (Zhao et al., 2005), I had to start analysis from raw data. Now, I tried using both the limma and marray Bioconductor packages, but both of them bail out with cryptic error messages. From what I've learnt by googling around, it seems that R doesn't like batch loading of tables of different length.
I have 177 samples and I have to normalize them all together. Apparently this is a quirk of marray and limma (or worse, R itself) which is preventing me to work properly. And this is not the first time it happens, either: in the past year I've lost a lot of time dealing with software issues rather than performing real analsis. The problem has been posted already on some R mailing lists (and on BioC, too), but judging from the responses I doubt I'll see a solution.
I guess I'll have to work around this somehow (and of course, this doesn't improve the idea I have of R...).